linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] perf,tool: partial time support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:22:25 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	kan.liang@...el.com
Cc:	acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
	ak@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] perf,tool: partial time support

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 06:19:03AM -0400, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> 
> When multiple events are sampled it may not be needed to collect fine
> grained time stamps on all events. The sample sites are usually nearby.
> It's enough to have time stamps on the regular reference events.
> This patchkit adds the ability to turn off time stamps per event. This
> in term can reduce sampling overhead and the size of the perf.data.

how is this usable in some perf example? I dont get the correlation
between 'refference' and the rest of the events in the report time..

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/