linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH-v3 02/11] i2c: pxa: No need to set slave addr for i2c master mode reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55A36441.2020206@linaro.org>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:39:53 +0530
From:	Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC:	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	robert.jarzmik@...e.fr, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	"Jett.Zhou" <jtzhou@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v3 02/11] i2c: pxa: No need to set slave addr for i2c
 master mode reset



On Friday 10 July 2015 08:26 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 07:55:31PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday 10 July 2015 07:44 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:08:43PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Friday 10 July 2015 01:41 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:54:46AM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>>>>>> Normally i2c controller works as master, so slave addr is not needed, or it
>>>>>> will impact some slave device (eg. ST NFC chip) i2c accesses, because it has
>>>>>> the same i2c address with controller.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just to make sure: Does it? As I read the code, slave interrupts are
>>>>> enabled later only when slave mode is selected? Is that a HW bug? And if
>>>>> so, can't the code just be moved into this #ifdef block later?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes we could, infact I thought about it;
>>>> but I would break recommended sequence here.
>>>
>>> And did you set the "own slave address" to a value which one of your
>>> existing i2c slaves also has (without enabling slave mode)? Did it
>>> disturb communication?
>>>
>>
>> Since slave and master mode are mutual exclusive,
>> I did not try this.
>
> Ehrm, what I meant was. Did you see the issue mentioned in the above
> commit message? Can you reproduce it? You don't need to enable slave
> mode for that, no?
>

Ohh yes,

I am able to reproduce this issue.

I have pxa1928 based board, where I have only PMIC 88PM860 connected to
I2C bus, and whenever I set slave address to 0x30 (PMIC slave address)
all I2C transaction for PMIC goes for toss.


Thanks,
Vaibhav

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/