lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:20:41 +0200 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, Andreas Faerber <afaerber@...e.de>, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: dts: Exynos4210: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property On Monday, July 13, 2015 08:10:21 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > 2015-07-13 20:02 GMT+09:00 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 09:24:40 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 23.06.2015 08:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> > On 23.06.2015 00:04, Michael Turquette wrote: > >> >> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2015-06-21 18:46:26) > >> >>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On 22.06.2015 10:38, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >> >>>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> >>>>>> 2015-05-08 9:18 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>: > >> >>>>>>> 2015-04-04 1:43 GMT+09:00 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>: > >> >>>>>>>> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> For Exynos4210 platforms, add CPU operating points and CPU > >> >>>>>>>> regulator supply properties for migrating from Exynos specific > >> >>>>>>>> cpufreq driver to using generic cpufreq driver. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Changes by Bartlomiej: > >> >>>>>>>> - removed Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 support for now > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com> > >> >>>>>>>> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> > >> >>>>>>>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk> > >> >>>>>>>> Cc: Andreas Faerber <afaerber@...e.de> > >> >>>>>>>> Cc: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org> > >> >>>>>>>> Cc: Andreas Farber <afaerber@...e.de> > >> >>>>>>>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk> > >> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com> > >> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Rebased and applied to my tree, I'll sent it later to Kukjin unless he > >> >>>>>> picks it by himself from LKML. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> Hi, as far as I know, this is for v4.2 not v4.1 so it will be applied based on > >> >>>>> v4.2-rc1 after v4.2-rc1 release. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> You mean it is for v4.3, not v4.2? > >> >>>> > >> >>> Oops, yes v4.3. > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks for the correction. > >> >> > >> >> Kukjin & Krzysztof, > >> >> > >> >> I'm confused on this point. I was planning to take patches 1, 2, 3, 5 > >> >> and 6 towards 4.2 (e.g. in the pull request that I'll send out this > >> >> week). > >> >> > >> >> Is patch 4 going out for 4.2 or 4.3? > >> > > >> > It is quite late for sending pull request to arm-soc for 4.2. > >> > For example SoCFPGA pull request from last week was rejected: > >> > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/417980 > >> > >> Oh, that was wrong link. Here it is: > >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg425911.html > >> > >> > If you want to take it for 4.2 then I am fine with it but this will > >> > cause some easy but annoying conflicts. There aren't difficult - just > >> > most of nodes in board DTS changed their place. > >> > > >> > Example of resolution (target file after merge, with cpu nodes reordered > >> > alphabetically): > >> > https://github.com/krzk/linux/commit/2cec3cb48abaf44848c62f1c0836b772eb4680dd > > > > This patch is needed for v4.2 as other changes has been already > > merged. > > > > Krzysztof/Kukjin, could you please take care of it? > > Of course! It is already in my queue. I'll send it later to Kukjin for > 4.3 (unless he picks it also). It is in your queue for v4.3 but the patch is needed for v4.2, without it cpufreq support will not work for Exynos4210 platforms. > BTW for other patchsets you still need acks from Samsung clock > maintainers. Did you poke Sylwester or Tomasz about it? Sylwester, please review/ack Samsung specific clock changes in Exynos5250 cpufreq and Exynos4x12 cpufreq patch series. Patch series: * [PATCH v3 0/4] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos5250 platform (http://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/1/311) * [PATCH v2 0/7] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform (http://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/9/419) Samsung clock specific changes: * [PATCH v3 1/4] clk: samsung: exynos5250: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate cpu clock (http://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/1/313) * [PATCH v2 4/7] clk: samsung: exynos4x12: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate cpu clock (http://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/9/424) Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists