lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150713120129.GX4341@mwanda>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:01:30 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Mateusz Kulikowski <mateusz.kulikowski@...il.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/22] staging: rtl8192e: Remove unused fields from
 rtllib_stats

On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 10:29:15PM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib.h
> index 8ba92ed..dc0653a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib.h
> @@ -691,27 +691,8 @@ struct rtllib_frag_entry {
>  };
>  
>  struct rtllib_stats {
> -	unsigned int tx_unicast_frames;
> -	unsigned int tx_multicast_frames;
> -	unsigned int tx_fragments;
> -	unsigned int tx_unicast_octets;
> -	unsigned int tx_multicast_octets;
> -	unsigned int tx_deferred_transmissions;
> -	unsigned int tx_single_retry_frames;
> -	unsigned int tx_multiple_retry_frames;
> -	unsigned int tx_retry_limit_exceeded;
>  	unsigned int tx_discards;
> -	unsigned int rx_unicast_frames;
> -	unsigned int rx_multicast_frames;
> -	unsigned int rx_fragments;
> -	unsigned int rx_unicast_octets;
> -	unsigned int rx_multicast_octets;
> -	unsigned int rx_fcs_errors;
> -	unsigned int rx_discards_no_buffer;
> -	unsigned int tx_discards_wrong_sa;
>  	unsigned int rx_discards_undecryptable;
> -	unsigned int rx_message_in_msg_fragments;
> -	unsigned int rx_message_in_bad_msg_fragments;
>  };

The remaining two struct members seem to be set but not used.  Can you
remove them as well in a later patch?

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ