[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <131222735.1080.1436815216582.JavaMail.open-xchange@ox1app>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 21:20:16 +0200 (CEST)
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: enforce inlining for atomics
> On July 13, 2015 at 8:27 PM Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
> wrote:
> > So I think the original patch makes sense (and I already applied it),
> > we want known-simple and performance critical methods (such as atomic
> > ops) always inlined.
>
> I will send more such force-inlining patches your way then.
Now? We discuss this a month back or so? :-)
Anyway, if so I prefer to group the patchset in at least two patches to
simplify review:
- performance criticial group
- inline assembler group
The former group contains all inline critical functions and the later to
identify functions where gcc has problems because their inline heuristic
for asm code is a toy.
Hagen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists