linux-kernel - Re: musb-hdrc: "Vbus off, timeout 1100 msec" message does not belong in sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:30:28 -0500
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
CC:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	<balbi@...com>, <tony@...mide.com>, <varkabhadram@...il.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
	<sre@...ian.org>, <sre@...g0.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <khilman@...nel.org>,
	<aaro.koskinen@....fi>, <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
	<patrikbachan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: musb-hdrc: "Vbus off, timeout 1100 msec" message does not belong
 in sysfs

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 09:17:39AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 07/09/2015 11:46 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Thu 2015-07-09 23:39:22, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> Hi!
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >>
> >> sysfs should contain one value per file. This one has at least two,
> >> with nice english sentence as a bonus.
> >>
> >> root@...0:/sys/devices/platform/68000000.ocp/480ab000.usb_otg_hs/musb-hdrc.0.auto#
> >> cat vbus
> >> Vbus off, timeout 1100 msec
> >>
> >> :-(.
> > 
> > Plus, documentation for this is nowhere to be seen:
> > 
> > pavel@amd:/data/l/linux-n900$ grep -ri musb Documentation/ABI/
> > pavel@amd:/data/l/linux-n900$
> 
> that is a shame indeed. It is part of the driver since TUSB support was
> merged via commit 550a7375f ("USB: Add MUSB and TUSB support") about 7
> years ago.
> The parameter expects the timeout values which is used to poll the port
> for mode changes (host/device mode) since it can not be detected on its
> own.
> Felipe knows best if it is better to document it or remove it. I can't
> remember that I needed it on am335x.

N900's usersland relies on it, IIRC. But it could be that it was used
just for testing. I'm not entirely sure.

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)