lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:17:59 -0700
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 06:34:42PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Yes. 'Nice' used in a sense that drivers have logic to release the
> memory anyway; mm asks volunteers (the drivers that have registered
> shrinker callbacks) to release some spare/wasted/etc. when things
> are getting tough (the drivers are not aware of that in general).
> This is surely important to mm, not to the driver though -- it just
> agrees to be 'nice', but even not expected to release any memory at
> all (IOW, this is not a contract).

Not registering the shrinker is a plain and simple memory leak.  Just
like a missing free your driver will appear to work fine for a while,
but eventually the leaks will bring down the whole system including
your driver.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ