linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v4 03/25] m68k/atari: Move Atari-specific code out of drivers/char/nvram.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:17:40 +1000 (AEST)
From:	Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 03/25] m68k/atari: Move Atari-specific code out of
 drivers/char/nvram.c


On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au> writes:
> 
> > BTW, I didn't change the SCSI ID location in NVRAM. This code says 16 
> > whereas atari_scsi says 14. Which one is correct?
> 
> I think atari_scsi is wrong.  The best source I could find 
> (http://www.gratifiant.com/nvram-falcon-t561185) places it after the 
> video mode byte, thus at byte 16.

Thanks for that. BTW, I googled a phrase from that page and found this one
  http://toshyp.atari.org/en/004009.html
which may be closer to the source.

I'll send a patch if someone can offer to test such a change to atari_scsi 
(or merely confirm that the SCSI ID setting in TOS does not match this_id 
given in dmesg).

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/