lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:34:15 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] memory-barriers: remove
 smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:43:44AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 00:15 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > > This is instead the sequence that is of concern:
> > > 
> > > 	store a
> > > 	unlock M
> > > 	lock N
> > > 	load b
> > 
> > So its late and that table didn't parse, but that should be ordered too.
> > The load of b should not be able to escape the lock N.
> > 
> > If only because LWSYNC is a valid RMB and any LOCK implementation must
> > load the lock state to observe it unlocked.
> 
> What happens is that the load passes the store conditional, though it
> doesn't pass the load with reserve. However, both store A and unlock M
> being just stores with an lwsync, can pass a load, so they can pass the
> load with reserve. And thus inside the LL/SC loop, our store A has
> passed our load B.

Ah cute.. Thanks, clearly I wasn't awake enough anymore :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists