[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK1hOcPvb3mOeVm5HMqSCKAyJv47HturM+C9uxvA1=KWn94dtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:41:54 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: Deinline iwl_{read,write}{8,32}
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com> wrote:
>> +#define IWL_READ_WRITE(static_inline) \
>> +static_inline void iwl_write8(struct iwl_trans *trans, u32 ofs, u8 val) \
>> +{ \
>> + trace_iwlwifi_dev_iowrite8(trans->dev, ofs, val); \
>> + iwl_trans_write8(trans, ofs, val); \
>> +} \
> [...]
>>
>> +#if !defined(CONFIG_IWLWIFI_DEVICE_TRACING)
>> +IWL_READ_WRITE(static inline)
>
> Not static_inline?
Yes. Here we are putting two words, "static inline", in front of every
function definition.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists