[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150714133825.GB24837@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:38:25 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] change get_super_thawed() to use
sb_start/end_write()
On 07/14, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> > @@ -621,8 +621,8 @@ struct super_block *get_super_thawed(struct block_device *bdev)
> > if (!s || s->s_writers.frozen == SB_UNFROZEN)
> > return s;
> > up_read(&s->s_umount);
> > - wait_event(s->s_writers.wait_unfrozen,
> > - s->s_writers.frozen == SB_UNFROZEN);
> > + sb_start_write(s);
> > + sb_end_intwrite(s);
>
> This is definitely buggy - you need to start and end freeze protection at
> the same level...
Of course ;) copy-and-paste bug. Thanks!
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists