[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150714153229.GH17660@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:32:29 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] memcg: get rid of mm_struct::owner
On Sat 11-07-15 10:09:06, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
[...]
> Why can't we make root_mem_cgroup statically allocated? AFAICS it's a
> common practice - e.g. see blkcg_root, root_task_group.
It's not that easy. mem_cgroup doesn't have a fixed size. It depends
on the number of online nodes. I haven't looked closer to this yet but
cgroup has an early init code path maybe we can hook in there.
I would like to settle with the current issues described in other email
first, though. This is just a cosmetic issue.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists