[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55A532FC.6090206@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:04:12 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <snitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Configurable max discard size
On 07/14/2015 10:01 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 09:02:17AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Most drivers use UINT_MAX (or some variant thereof) for max discard
>> size, since they don't have a real limit for a non-data transferring
>> command. This is fine from a throughput point of view, but for a lot
>> of devices (all?), it truly sucks on latency. We've seen cases of
>> hundreds of msec in latencies for reads/writes when deleting files
>> on an fs with discard enabled. For the problematic devices that we
>> have tested, artificially limiting the size of the discards issued
>> brings it down to a more manageable 1-2ms max latencies.
>
> This looks reasonable to me. Any chance you could also come up
> with reasonable start values for the hardware you've done this for
> so that we can get a good out of the box experience?
Based on experimentation with two different vendors, 64MB would be a
good default. Question is how best to set that. At least with the
current patch, untouched, 'discard_max_bytes' will still show the hw max
value. If I default it to 64MB, we'd lose that information until people
started bumping it up in size. Maybe that's not such a big deal, however.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists