linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] dts: ls1021a: Add dts nodes for eTSEC0, eTSEC1 and eTSEC2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:13:12 +0000
From:	Manoil Claudiu <claudiu.manoil@...escale.com>
To:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Huan Wang <alison.wang@...escale.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] dts: ls1021a: Add dts nodes for eTSEC0, eTSEC1 and
 eTSEC2

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:festevam@...il.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 6:57 PM
> To: Manoil Claudiu-B08782
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
> kernel; Shawn Guo; Wang Huan-B18965
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dts: ls1021a: Add dts nodes for eTSEC0, eTSEC1 and
> eTSEC2
> 
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Claudiu Manoil
> <claudiu.manoil@...escale.com> wrote:
> > This patch adds generic dts nodes for eTSEC0, eTSEC1 and eTSEC2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alison Wang <alison.wang@...escale.com>
> >
> > Enable support for the second interrupt group register block
> > and the corresponding Rx/Tx/Err interrupt sources, for each
> > eTSEC node.  DT binding documentation updates.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@...escale.com>
> 
> It seems you missed to put Alison in the From field.
> 
> You should also put his Signed-off-by tag just before yours.

Is this a rule invented by you?  Last time I checked this was a
valid patch format.  Also, this time I sent the (updated) patch,
not Alison, which should explain the "From" part. Thanks.