[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507141901460.18576@nanos>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 19:32:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, xiao jin <jin.xiao@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] hotplug: Prevent alloc/free of irq descriptors during
cpu up/down
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 07/14/2015 11:44 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Jul 2015, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > > > Prevent allocation and freeing of interrupt descriptors accross cpu
> > > > hotplug.
> > >
> > > This breaks Xen guests that allocate interrupt descriptors in .cpu_up().
> > And where exactly does XEN allocate those descriptors?
>
> xen_cpu_up()
> xen_setup_timer()
> bind_virq_to_irqhandler()
> bind_virq_to_irq()
> xen_allocate_irq_dynamic()
> xen_allocate_irqs_dynamic()
> irq_alloc_descs()
>
>
> There is also a similar pass via xen_cpu_up() -> xen_smp_intr_init()
Sigh.
>
> >
> > > Any chance this locking can be moved into arch code?
> > No.
The issue here is that all architectures need that protection and just
Xen does irq allocations in cpu_up.
So moving that protection into architecture code is not really an
option.
> > > Otherwise we will need to have something like arch_post_cpu_up()
> > > after the lock is released.
I'm not sure, that this will work. You probably want to do this in the
cpu prepare stage, i.e. before calling __cpu_up().
I have to walk the dogs now. Will look into it later tonight.
> > > (The patch doesn't appear to have any side effects for the down path since
> > > Xen
> > > guests deallocate descriptors in __cpu_die()).
> > Exact place please.
>
> Whose place? Where descriptors are deallocated?
>
> __cpu_die()
> xen_cpu_die()
> xen_teardown_timer()
> unbind_from_irqhandler()
> unbind_from_irq()
> __unbind_from_irq()
> xen_free_irq()
> irq_free_descs()
> free_desc()
Right, that's outside the lock held region.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists