linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: mgc: no need to compare bool value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150714023814.GA11616@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:38:14 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Luis de Bethencourt <luis@...ethencourt.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
	"John L. Hammond" <john.hammond@...el.com>,
	Ryan Haasken <haasken@...y.com>,
	Heena Sirwani <heenasirwani@...il.com>,
	Hatice ERTÜRK <haticeerturk27@...il.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Supriya Karanth <iskaranth@...il.com>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
	Bobi Jam <bobijam.xu@...el.com>, HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: mgc: no need to compare bool value

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 04:26:11PM +0200, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> Inverting the value of eof is a more direct way of passing to the debugging
> function if eof is false or not.

Really?  I like the explicit-ness of the code as it is today, it's more
obvious what is going on, which is the most important thing.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/