[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150714213148.GD2273@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:31:48 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
Cc: lizefan@...wei.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
richard@....at, fweisbec@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 4/4] cgroup: implement the PIDs subsystem
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 01:53:04PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 09:32:10PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > Adds a new single-purpose PIDs subsystem to limit the number of
> > tasks that can be forked inside a cgroup. Essentially this is an
> > implementation of RLIMIT_NPROC that applies to a cgroup rather than a
> > process tree.
> >
> > However, it should be noted that organisational operations (adding and
> > removing tasks from a PIDs hierarchy) will *not* be prevented. Rather,
> > the number of tasks in the hierarchy cannot exceed the limit through
> > forking. This is due to the fact that, in the unified hierarchy, attach
> > cannot fail (and it is not possible for a task to overcome its PIDs
> > cgroup policy limit by attaching to a child cgroup -- even if migrating
> > mid-fork it must be able to fork in the parent first).
> >
> > PIDs are fundamentally a global resource, and it is possible to reach
> > PID exhaustion inside a cgroup without hitting any reasonable kmemcg
> > policy. Once you've hit PID exhaustion, you're only in a marginally
> > better state than OOM. This subsystem allows PID exhaustion inside a
> > cgroup to be prevented.
>
> Patches 3-4 look good to me. Will apply once v4.3 dev window opens.
Applied 3-4 to cgroup/for-4.3.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists