[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150714215649.GQ19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:56:49 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] x86/stackvalidate: Compile-time stack validation
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 04:30:34PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > How (if it does at all) deal with function-trace / -pg -fprofile-arcs
> > things? Does it silently ignore the __mcount calls and assumes ftrace
> > knows wtf its doing? ;-)
>
> Adding Steven to CC to keep me honest.
>
> In the case of "-pg -mfentry", which is what ftrace has relied on for
Ah -mfentry is the magic word, I couldn't find it and a grep led me
astray.
> the past few years for newer versions of gcc, stackvalidate silently
> ignores __fentry__ calls and assumes that ftrace indeed knows wtf it's
> doing. I don't see a problem there as long as the ftrace handler
> doesn't sleep.
They should not indeed, however it would be very nice if backtraces
would still be 'good'.
> I haven't run stackvalidate on the old "-pg" mcount non-fentry stuff,
> but I think it creates a stack frame before calling mcount, so it should
> be fine.
Ok.
> I don't know much about -fprofile-arcs, but as far as I can tell, it's
> only used for gcov.
Right, nobody much uses that I think.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists