[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWU+00SAmpcNCbtgxnu2Pfk8F0BLczpZYb48z2-rORWwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:33:39 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/irq, context_tracking: Document how IRQ context
tracking works and add an RCU assertion
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:54:32AM -0700, tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Commit-ID: 0333a209cbf600e980fc55c24878a56f25f48b65
>> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/0333a209cbf600e980fc55c24878a56f25f48b65
>> Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>> AuthorDate: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 12:44:34 -0700
>> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>> CommitDate: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 10:59:10 +0200
>>
>> x86/irq, context_tracking: Document how IRQ context tracking works and add an RCU assertion
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
>> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
>> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
>> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
>> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e8bdc4ed0193fb2fd130f3d6b7b8023e2ec1ab62.1435952415.git.luto@kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
>> index 88b36648..6233de0 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
>> @@ -216,8 +216,23 @@ __visible unsigned int __irq_entry do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> unsigned vector = ~regs->orig_ax;
>> unsigned irq;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * NB: Unlike exception entries, IRQ entries do not reliably
>> + * handle context tracking in the low-level entry code. This is
>> + * because syscall entries execute briefly with IRQs on before
>> + * updating context tracking state, so we can take an IRQ from
>> + * kernel mode with CONTEXT_USER. The low-level entry code only
>> + * updates the context if we came from user mode, so we won't
>> + * switch to CONTEXT_KERNEL. We'll fix that once the syscall
>> + * code is cleaned up enough that we can cleanly defer enabling
>> + * IRQs.
>> + */
>> +
>
> Now is it a problem to take interrupts in kernel mode with CONTEXT_USER?
> I'm not sure it's worth trying to make it not happen.
It's not currently a problem, but it would be nice if we could do the
equivalent of:
if (user_mode(regs)) {
user_exit(); (or enter_from_user_mode or whatever)
} else {
// don't bother -- already in CONTEXT_KERNEL
}
i.e. the same thing that do_general_protection, etc do in -tip. That
would get rid of any need to store the previous context.
Currently we can't because of syscalls and maybe because of KVM. KVM
has a weird fake interrupt thing.
>
>> entering_irq();
>>
>> + /* entering_irq() tells RCU that we're not quiescent. Check it. */
>> + rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_is_watching(), "IRQ failed to wake up RCU");
>
> Why do we need to check that?
Sanity check. If we're changing a bunch of context tracking details,
I want to assert that it actually works.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists