linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rfkill-gpio: Add support for the Realtek 8723 BT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1436941671.20249.60.camel@hadess.net>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:27:51 +0200
From:	Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>
To:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfkill-gpio: Add support for the Realtek 8723 BT

On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 17:29 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
> 
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/127706/
> > focu
> > s=127896
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>
> > 
> > ---
> > net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c b/net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c
> > index d5d58d9..9471024 100644
> > --- a/net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c
> > +++ b/net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c
> > @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id
> > rfkill_acpi_match[] = {
> > 	{ "BCM2E3D", RFKILL_TYPE_BLUETOOTH },
> > 	{ "BCM2E40", RFKILL_TYPE_BLUETOOTH },
> > 	{ "BCM2E64", RFKILL_TYPE_BLUETOOTH },
> > +	{ "OBDA8723", RFKILL_TYPE_BLUETOOTH },
> > 	{ "BCM4752", RFKILL_TYPE_GPS },
> > 	{ "LNV4752", RFKILL_TYPE_GPS },
> > 	{ },
> 
> while this is most likely a good start to get people going and 
> testing the hardware, I think long-term some these IDs have to move 
> out of this driver and into a Realtek specific UART slave driver 
> (once we get such a thing upstream).
> 
> I think one example would be what Fred is currently doing for the 
> Broadcom UART devices. Essentially we are currently misusing the 
> RFKILL switch for an on/off switch of the GPIO lines. This would be 
> better handled by the Bluetooth subsystem itself when you power on 
> the controller.

Duly noted. I'll postpone that until I have time to do hardware
enablement on the Bluetooth side of that chipset.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/