lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:12:31 +0100
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 156/185] tty: remove platform_sysrq_reset_seq

3.16.7-ckt15 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

commit abab381feea7e61a0b5125504aa955cf339676ca upstream.

The platform_sysrq_reset_seq code was intended as a way for an embedded
platform to provide its own sysrq sequence at compile time. After over
two years, nobody has started using it in an upstream kernel, and
the platforms that were interested in it have moved on to devicetree,
which can be used to configure the sequence without requiring kernel
changes. The method is also incompatible with the way that most
architectures build support for multiple platforms into a single
kernel.

Now the code is producing warnings when built with gcc-5.1:

drivers/tty/sysrq.c: In function 'sysrq_init':
drivers/tty/sysrq.c:959:33: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
   key = platform_sysrq_reset_seq[i];

We could fix this, but it seems unlikely that it will ever be used,
so let's just remove the code instead. We still have the option to
pass the sequence either in DT, using the kernel command line,
or using the /sys/module/sysrq/parameters/reset_seq file.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Fixes: 154b7a489a ("Input: sysrq - allow specifying alternate reset sequence")
----
v2: moved sysrq_reset_downtime_ms variable to avoid introducing a compile
    warning when CONFIG_INPUT is disabled
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 19 +------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
index 454b65898e2c..b5e98de489dc 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
@@ -55,9 +55,6 @@
 static int __read_mostly sysrq_enabled = CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ_DEFAULT_ENABLE;
 static bool __read_mostly sysrq_always_enabled;
 
-unsigned short platform_sysrq_reset_seq[] __weak = { KEY_RESERVED };
-int sysrq_reset_downtime_ms __weak;
-
 static bool sysrq_on(void)
 {
 	return sysrq_enabled || sysrq_always_enabled;
@@ -567,6 +564,7 @@ void handle_sysrq(int key)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(handle_sysrq);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_INPUT
+static int sysrq_reset_downtime_ms;
 
 /* Simple translation table for the SysRq keys */
 static const unsigned char sysrq_xlate[KEY_CNT] =
@@ -947,23 +945,8 @@ static bool sysrq_handler_registered;
 
 static inline void sysrq_register_handler(void)
 {
-	unsigned short key;
 	int error;
-	int i;
-
-	/* First check if a __weak interface was instantiated. */
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sysrq_reset_seq); i++) {
-		key = platform_sysrq_reset_seq[i];
-		if (key == KEY_RESERVED || key > KEY_MAX)
-			break;
-
-		sysrq_reset_seq[sysrq_reset_seq_len++] = key;
-	}
 
-	/*
-	 * DT configuration takes precedence over anything that would
-	 * have been defined via the __weak interface.
-	 */
 	sysrq_of_get_keyreset_config();
 
 	error = input_register_handler(&sysrq_handler);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ