[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150715101627.GA21770@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:16:28 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Compile-time stack validation
* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:14:06PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Posting a listing of reported warnings in a reply to this email.
>
> These are the reported stackvalidate warnings on tip/master with my Fedora-based
> config. There were 1399 warnings in 26 .c files and 16 .S files. It was mostly
> repeat warnings so I removed a lot of the repeats to keep it short.
Are most of these warnings legit, what's the false positive rate in your
impression?
You might want to start fixing a few typical types, just to see what it involves
exactly and whether we want to fix it that way.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists