| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1436926417-20256-6-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:13:36 -0400
From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@...com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Opportunistically defer kicking to unlock time
Performing CPU kicking at lock time can be a bit faster if there
is no kick-ahead. On the other hand, deferring it to unlock time is
preferrable when kick-ahead can be performed or when the VM guest is
having too few vCPUs that a vCPU may be kicked twice before getting
the lock. This patch implements the deferring kicking when either
one of the above 2 conditions is true.
Linux kernel builds were run in KVM guest on an 8-socket, 4
cores/socket Westmere-EX system and a 4-socket, 8 cores/socket
Haswell-EX system. Both systems are configured to have 32 physical
CPUs. The kernel build times before and after the patch were:
Westmere Haswell
Patch 32 vCPUs 48 vCPUs 32 vCPUs 48 vCPUs
----- -------- -------- -------- --------
Before patch 3m27.4s 10m32.0s 2m00.8s 14m52.5s
After patch 3m01.3s 9m50.9s 2m00.5s 13m28.1s
On Westmere, both 32/48 vCPUs case showed some sizeable increase
in performance. For Haswell, there was some improvement in the
overcommitted (48 vCPUs) case.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
---
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 6 +-
kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
index 6518ee9..94fdd27 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -259,8 +259,8 @@ static __always_inline void set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
static __always_inline void __pv_init_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
static __always_inline void __pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
-static __always_inline void __pv_kick_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
-
+static __always_inline void __pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock,
+ struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
static __always_inline void __pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock,
struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ queue:
cpu_relax();
arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(&next->locked);
- pv_kick_node(next);
+ pv_kick_node(lock, next);
release:
/*
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
index f3ceeff..1f0485c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct pv_node {
int cpu;
u8 state;
+ u8 hashed; /* Set if in hashed table */
};
/*
@@ -336,6 +337,7 @@ static void pv_init_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node)
pn->cpu = smp_processor_id();
pn->state = vcpu_running;
+ pn->hashed = 0;
}
/*
@@ -455,18 +457,21 @@ static void pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node)
/*
* Helper to get the address of the next kickable node
- * The node has to be in the halted state and is being transitioned to
- * running state by this function. Otherwise, NULL will be returned.
+ *
+ * The node has to be in the halted state. If the chkonly flag is set,
+ * the CPU state won't be changed. Otherwise, it will be transitioned to
+ * running state by this function. If no kickable node is found, NULL
+ * will be returned.
*/
-static inline struct pv_node *pv_get_kick_node(struct pv_node *node)
+static inline struct pv_node *
+pv_get_kick_node(struct pv_node *node, int chkonly)
{
struct pv_node *next = (struct pv_node *)READ_ONCE(node->mcs.next);
- if (!next)
+ if (!next || (READ_ONCE(next->state) != vcpu_halted))
return NULL;
- if ((READ_ONCE(next->state) != vcpu_halted) ||
- (xchg(&next->state, vcpu_running) != vcpu_halted))
+ if (!chkonly && (xchg(&next->state, vcpu_running) != vcpu_halted))
next = NULL; /* No kicking is needed */
return next;
@@ -476,23 +481,50 @@ static inline struct pv_node *pv_get_kick_node(struct pv_node *node)
* Called after setting next->locked = 1, used to wake those stuck in
* pv_wait_node().
*/
-static void pv_kick_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node)
+static void pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
{
struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node;
+ if (xchg(&pn->state, vcpu_running) == vcpu_running)
+ return;
+
/*
- * Note that because node->locked is already set, this actual
- * mcs_spinlock entry could be re-used already.
+ * Kicking the next node at lock time can actually be a bit faster
+ * than doing it at unlock time because the critical section time
+ * overlaps with the wakeup latency of the next node. However, if the
+ * VM is too overcommmitted, it can happen that we need to kick the
+ * CPU again at unlock time (double-kick). To avoid that and also to
+ * fully utilize the kick-ahead functionality at unlock time,
+ * the kicking will be deferred under either one of the following
+ * 2 conditions:
*
- * This should be fine however, kicking people for no reason is
- * harmless.
+ * 1) The VM guest has too few vCPUs that kick-ahead is not even
+ * enabled. In this case, the chance of double-kick will be
+ * higher.
+ * 2) The node after the next one is also in the halted state.
*
- * See the comment in pv_wait_node().
+ * In this case, the hashed flag is set to indicate that hashed
+ * table has been filled and _Q_SLOW_VAL is set.
*/
- if (xchg(&pn->state, vcpu_running) == vcpu_halted) {
- pvstat_inc(pvstat_lock_kick);
- pv_kick(pn->cpu);
+ if ((!pv_kick_ahead || pv_get_kick_node(pn, 1)) &&
+ (xchg(&pn->hashed, 1) == 0)) {
+ struct __qspinlock *l = (void *)lock;
+
+ /*
+ * As this is the same vCPU that will check the _Q_SLOW_VAL
+ * value and the hash table later on at unlock time, no atomic
+ * instruction is needed.
+ */
+ WRITE_ONCE(l->locked, _Q_SLOW_VAL);
+ (void)pv_hash(lock, pn);
+ return;
}
+
+ /*
+ * Kicking the vCPU even if it is not really halted is safe.
+ */
+ pvstat_inc(pvstat_lock_kick);
+ pv_kick(pn->cpu);
}
/*
@@ -513,6 +545,13 @@ static void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
cpu_relax();
}
+ if (!lp && (xchg(&pn->hashed, 1) == 1))
+ /*
+ * The hashed table & _Q_SLOW_VAL had been filled
+ * by the lock holder.
+ */
+ lp = (struct qspinlock **)-1;
+
if (!lp) { /* ONCE */
lp = pv_hash(lock, pn);
/*
@@ -584,7 +623,7 @@ __visible void __pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
* should improve performance on an overcommitted system.
*/
for (nr_kick = 0, nxt = node; nr_kick < pv_kick_ahead; nr_kick++) {
- nxt = next[nr_kick] = pv_get_kick_node(nxt);
+ nxt = next[nr_kick] = pv_get_kick_node(nxt, 0);
if (!nxt)
break;
}
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists