linux-kernel - Re: [Patch V5 00/16] xen: support pv-domains larger than 512GB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1EB58ABC-2F53-4B36-A2D7-FDF4C7332EA3@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:07:11 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	david.vrabel@...rix.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [Patch V5 00/16] xen: support pv-domains larger than 512GB

On July 15, 2015 12:26:40 AM EDT, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com> wrote:
>On 07/10/2015 03:39 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:47:45PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> Support 64 bit pv-domains with more than 512GB of memory.
>>>
>>> Following test have been done:
>>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine
>>> - 64 bit dom0 on 1TB machine (resolving p2m/E820-map conflict)
>>> - 32 bit dom0 on 8GB machine
>>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked kernel/E820-map conflict
>>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked pgtable/E820-map conflict
>>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked initrd/E820-map conflict
>>> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked p2m/E820-map conflict
>>> - 64 bit domU (sizes up to 900GB)
>>> - 32 bit domU
>>
>> Woot!
>>
>> Thank you for doing that. I noticed that you used the 'normal'
>> sizes, but nothing as odd as '3145M' or such to try to break
>> things. Not sure if it is worht it - as the test suite that
>> Boris runs does run with some odd sizes to catch this.
>
>How did you notice the domU sizes from these lines? :-)

Intuition :-)
>
>I tested with sizes being power of 2 as well as other values (e.g.
>100000 MB).
>
>> I only had one comment about the #13 patch, otherwise I think
>> we are OK with this patchset?
>
>Can I take this as an "Acked-by" for the other patches?

Yes!
>
>
>Juergen


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/