linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] can: mcp251x: fix resume when device is down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:17:47 +0200
From:	Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	wg@...ndegger.com, chripell@...e.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] can: mcp251x: fix resume when device is down

On 2015-07-15 15:15, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 07/15/2015 03:05 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> Hi Marc, hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> Any comment on this two patches? I don't think these have made it in any
>> tree...
> 
> Sorry - Should I add stable in Cc for 1/2 or even both?

2/2 does not fix an actual issue, it only prevents dummy regulators
being created. It even has a slight potential of a regression, in case
the absence of a dummy regulator could not be handled properly...

But 1/2 is definitely stable material.

--
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/