linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] PM / sleep: Go direct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1507151444460.18896-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:47:50 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
cc:	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] PM / sleep: Go direct_complete if driver has no
 callbacks

On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:

> If a suitable prepare callback cannot be found for a given device and
> its driver has no PM callbacks at all, assume that it can go direct to
> complete when the system goes to sleep.
> 
> The reason for this is that there's lots of devices in a system that do
> no PM at all and there's no reason for them to prevent their ancestors
> to do direct_complete if they can support it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/base/power/main.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> index 1710c26ba097..edda3f233c7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> @@ -1540,6 +1540,21 @@ int dpm_suspend(pm_message_t state)
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> +static bool driver_has_no_pm_callbacks(struct device_driver *drv)
> +{
> +	if (!drv->pm)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return !drv->pm->prepare &&
> +	       !drv->pm->suspend &&
> +	       !drv->pm->suspend_late &&
> +	       !drv->pm->suspend_noirq &&
> +	       !drv->pm->resume_noirq &&
> +	       !drv->pm->resume_early &&
> +	       !drv->pm->resume &&
> +	       !drv->pm->complete;
> +}

This isn't exactly what I meant.  We also need to check the dev_pm_ops 
fields in dev->pm_domain, dev->type, dev->class, and dev->bus.  Only if 
_all_ of these callbacks are missing should we use direct_complete.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/