| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55A6B826.7060304@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:44:38 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...ymobile.com>
CC: "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Andersson, Björn"
<Bjorn.Andersson@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: qcom: Add coincell charger driver
On 07/15/2015 12:08 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
>
> On 07/14/2015 06:11 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 07/14/2015 04:26 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
>>
>>> 3 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/qcom-coincell.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
>>> index 42c3852..0909869 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
>>> @@ -271,6 +271,17 @@ config HP_ILO
>>> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
>>> module will be called hpilo.
>>>
>>> +config QCOM_COINCELL
>>> + tristate "Qualcomm coincell charger support"
>>> + depends on OF
>> It looks like it would compile fine without OF, so can we drop this
>> dependency? Or make it into
>>
>> depends on MFD_SPMI_PMIC || COMPILE_TEST
>>
>> ?
> I think I had CONFIG_OF off one time, and I spent the better
> part of the afternoon trying to figure out why the driver wasn't
> loading. So it compiles but doesn't actually work.
> But I think a dependency on MFD_SPMI_PMIC solves this issue.
> So, OK on the second suggestion.
>
>>> + select REGMAP
This config wouldn't be necessary either then because it would be
selected implicitly by the SPMI parent driver.
>>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/qcom-coincell.c b/drivers/misc/qcom-coincell.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..9c019e4
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/misc/qcom-coincell.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
>>> +/* Copyright (c) 2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2015, Sony Mobile Communications Inc.
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
>>> + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>> +
>>> +struct qcom_coincell {
>>> + struct device *dev;
>>> + struct regmap *regmap;
>>> + u32 base_addr;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +#define QCOM_COINCELL_REG_RSET 0x44
>>> +#define QCOM_COINCELL_REG_VSET 0x45
>>> +#define QCOM_COINCELL_REG_ENABLE 0x46
>>> +
>>> +#define QCOM_COINCELL_ENABLE BIT(7)
>>> +
>>> +static const int qcom_rset_map[] = {2100, 1700, 1200, 800};
>>> +static const int qcom_vset_map[] = {2500, 3200, 3100, 3000};
>> Nitpick: put spaces around those braces.
> OK. I presume you mean like this:
> { 2100, 1700, 1200, 800 };
Yep.
>
>
>>> + return rc;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int qcom_coincell_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> + struct qcom_coincell *chgr;
>>> + u32 rset, vset, enable;
>>> + int rc;
>>> +
>>> + if (!node) {
>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: device node missing\n", __func__);
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> + }
>> Does this happen?
> Probably not any more. The only way this device gets initialized now
> is via OF operations. This code was forward-ported from when this driver
> also operated as a platform device. In the current situation, I don't
> know of a way for the kernel to get here if of_node is missing
> (but I'm not an OF expert, and I didn't want to start using
> a NULL of_node.)
>
> What does of_property_read...() do with a NULL node?
I'm pretty sure it returns success or nothing when the node is NULL.
>
> I'm a little leery of taking this check out, but if you think it's
> OK I'm fine doing it.
I'll fix any problems with the removal of the check :)
>
>>> +
>>> + chgr = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*chgr), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!chgr)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + chgr->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> +
>>> + chgr->regmap = dev_get_regmap(pdev->dev.parent, NULL);
>>> + if (!chgr->regmap) {
>>> + dev_err(chgr->dev, "Unable to get regmap\n");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + rc = of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &chgr->base_addr);
>>> + if (rc)
>>> + return rc;
>>> +
>>> + rc = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,rset-ohms", &rset);
>>> + if (rc) {
>>> + dev_err(chgr->dev, "can't find 'qcom,rset-ohms' in DT block");
>>> + return rc;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + rc = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,vset-millivolts", &vset);
>>> + if (rc) {
>>> + dev_err(chgr->dev,
>>> + "can't find 'qcom,vset-millivolts' in DT block");
>>> + return rc;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + rc = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,charge-enable", &enable);
>> This should be a bool:
>>
>> enable = of_property_read_bool(node, "qcom,charge-enable");
> OK.
>
>>> + if (rc)
>>> + enable = 0;
>>> +
>>> + rc = qcom_coincell_chgr_config(chgr, rset, vset, enable);
>>> +
>>> + return rc;
This could be simplified to a return qcom_coincell_chrg_config() too.
Also, do we even need the chgr structure allocated anywhere besides on
the stack? It seems that it will be memory that's just lying around for
no use after probe.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists