linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/3] Shared NMI backtracing support for ARM/x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150715203911.GF7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:39:12 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc:	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Shared NMI backtracing support for ARM/x86

Back in September, I stumbled across a single CPU IRQs-off lockup of an
ARM SMP system, and decided to hack something together based on a much
older hacky implementation used with StrongARM CPUs from early 2000s.

This resulted in a copy of the x86 NMI backtrace code into ARM as it was
back then, and feedback indicated that it wasn't a good time to push
such an effort forward, as printk() in NMI context is dodgy.

Over time, the x86 code has had this problem addressed, and last week
I updated the patch which I've been carrying in my tree to move the
shared code out of arch/x86 into lib/ rather than duplicating it, and
switch the ARM implementation to use it.

Discussing this with Thomas Gliexner, he agreed to give it a test over
last weekend, and he has reported to me this evening "no explosion so
far".  Since then, I've made a change to add the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() to
the generic handler as per the x86 original code.

I'm aware that there are other competing implementations out there -
Daniel has one based on my patch from September time, but I don't think
that goes far enough with code sharing.  I'm also partially aware of
an implementation from Petr too.

 arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h    |   5 ++
 arch/arm/kernel/smp.c         |  18 +++++
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c | 133 ++--------------------------------
 include/linux/nmi.h           |   6 ++
 lib/Makefile                  |   2 +-
 lib/nmi_backtrace.c           | 162 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/