[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150715224758.GS15934@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:47:58 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] powerpc/numa: fix cpu_to_node() usage during boot
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:43:51PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Ok, thank you for clarifying! From a correctness perspective, even if
> the numbers don't match NUMA nodes, should we expect the grouping to be
> split along NUMA topology?
Yeap, the groups get formed according to the node distances. Nodes
which are not at LOCAL_DISTANCE are always put in different groups.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists