linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] BPF JIT fixes and features for ARM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55A7EB66.7030700@plumgrid.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:35:34 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] BPF JIT fixes and features for ARM

On 7/16/15 9:46 AM, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
> This serie fixes issues with the ARM BPF JIT and adds support for more
> instructions to the ARM BPF JIT.
>
> The first three patches are fixing bugs in the ARM JIT and should
> probably find their way to a stable kernel.
>
> The last three patches add support to the ARM JIT for more BPF
> instructions, namely skb netdevice type retrieval, skb payload offset
> retrieval, and skb packet type retrieval.
>
> With the first three patches, all 60 test_bpf tests in Linux 4.1 release
> are now passing OK (was 54 out of 60 before).
>
> The last three patches allow 35 tests to use the JIT instead of 29
> before.

looks good to me.
For the series:
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>

you might want to try the latest 4.2-rc, since it has 238 tests :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/