[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pp3rj3uj.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:32:20 +0200
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, arm@...nel.org,
Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] irqchip: kill off set_irq_flags usage
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> writes:
>> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc911x.c
>> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c
>> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
>>
>> Those might still be, but on the DT based boards the probing should be
>> completely irrelevant
>
> SA11x0 stuff uses smc91x.c
PXA uses it also for lubbock, mainstone and zylonite boards, which are not yet
converted to DT, and won't drop platform_data, even if they are DT converted.
I remember testing this patchset on lubbock at least.
> ucb1x00.c definitely uses IRQ probing on SA11x0 platforms.
For PXA I must admit I don't yet know. I know lubbock has an UCB1400, but I
don't have it working yet, so I can't foresee the problems yet.
Cheers.
--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists