[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1437088996-28511-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:23:13 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: travis@....com, roland@...estorage.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
mcgrof@...e.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] mm, x86: Fix ioremap RAM check interfaces
ioremap() checks if a target range is in RAM and fails the request
if true. There are multiple issues in the iormap RAM check interfaces.
1. region_is_ram() always fails with -1.
2. The check calls two functions, region_is_ram() and
walk_system_ram_range(), which are redundant as both walk the
same iomem_resource table.
3. walk_system_ram_range() requires RAM ranges be page-aligned in
the iomem_resource table to work properly. This restriction
has allowed multiple ioremaps to RAM which are page-unaligned.
This patchset solves issue 1 and 2. It does not address issue 3,
but continues to allow the existing ioremaps to work until it is
addressed.
---
resend:
- Rebased to 4.2-rc2 (no change needed). Modified change logs.
---
Toshi Kani (3):
1/3 mm, x86: Fix warning in ioremap RAM check
2/3 mm, x86: Remove region_is_ram() call from ioremap
3/3 mm: Fix bugs in region_is_ram()
---
arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 23 ++++++-----------------
kernel/resource.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists