[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1437088996-28511-3-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:23:15 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: travis@....com, roland@...estorage.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
mcgrof@...e.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 2/3] mm, x86: Remove region_is_ram() call from ioremap
__ioremap_caller() calls region_is_ram() to walk through the
iomem_resource table to check if a target range is in RAM, which
was added to improve the lookup performance over page_is_ram()
(commit 906e36c5c717 "x86: use optimized ioresource lookup in
ioremap function"). page_is_ram() was no longer used when this
change was added, though.
__ioremap_caller() then calls walk_system_ram_range(), which had
replaced page_is_ram() to improve the lookup performance (commit
c81c8a1eeede "x86, ioremap: Speed up check for RAM pages").
Since both checks walk through the same iomem_resource table for
the same purpose, there is no need to call the two functions.
Furthermore, region_is_ram() always returns with -1, which makes
walk_system_ram_range() as the only check being used at this point.
Therefore, this patch changes __ioremap_caller() to call
walk_system_ram_range() only.
Note, removing the call to region_is_ram() is also necessary to
fix bugs in region_is_ram(). walk_system_ram_range() requires
RAM ranges be page-aligned in the iomem_resource table to work
properly. This restriction has allowed multiple ioremaps to RAM
(setup_data) which are page-unaligned. Using fixed region_is_ram()
will cause these callers to start failing. After all ioremap
callers to setup_data are converted, __ioremap_caller() may call
region_is_ram() instead to remove this restriction.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...e.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
---
arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 24 ++++++------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
index fd3df0d..b9d4a33 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
pgprot_t prot;
int retval;
void __iomem *ret_addr;
- int ram_region;
/* Don't allow wraparound or zero size */
last_addr = phys_addr + size - 1;
@@ -115,26 +114,15 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
/*
* Don't allow anybody to remap normal RAM that we're using..
*/
- /* First check if whole region can be identified as RAM or not */
- ram_region = region_is_ram(phys_addr, size);
- if (ram_region > 0) {
- WARN_ONCE(1, "ioremap on RAM at 0x%lx - 0x%lx\n",
- (unsigned long int)phys_addr,
- (unsigned long int)last_addr);
- return NULL;
- }
-
- /* If could not be identified(-1), check page by page */
- if (ram_region < 0) {
- pfn = phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- last_pfn = last_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- if (walk_system_ram_range(pfn, last_pfn - pfn + 1, NULL,
+ pfn = phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ last_pfn = last_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ if (walk_system_ram_range(pfn, last_pfn - pfn + 1, NULL,
__ioremap_check_ram) == 1) {
- WARN_ONCE(1, "ioremap on RAM at 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "ioremap on RAM at 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
phys_addr, last_addr);
- return NULL;
- }
+ return NULL;
}
+
/*
* Mappings have to be page-aligned
*/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists