lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1437008972-9140-32-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:05:52 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	David Härdeman <david@...deman.nu>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 031/251] [media] rc-core: fix dib0700 scancode generation for RC5

3.19.8-ckt4 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: =?UTF-8?q?David=20H=C3=A4rdeman?= <david@...deman.nu>

commit 4d298b8539ed59f1d69d3aa6e41a2c4908137612 upstream.

commit af3a4a9bbeb0 ("[media] dib0700: NEC scancode cleanup") cleaned
up the NEC scancode logic but overlooked the RC5 case.

This patch brings the RC5 case in line with the NEC code and makes
the struct self-documenting.

Signed-off-by: David Härdeman <david@...deman.nu>
Reported-by: David Cimbůrek <david.cimburek@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c
index 50856db..605b090 100644
--- a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c
@@ -658,10 +658,20 @@ out:
 struct dib0700_rc_response {
 	u8 report_id;
 	u8 data_state;
-	u8 system;
-	u8 not_system;
-	u8 data;
-	u8 not_data;
+	union {
+		struct {
+			u8 system;
+			u8 not_system;
+			u8 data;
+			u8 not_data;
+		} nec;
+		struct {
+			u8 not_used;
+			u8 system;
+			u8 data;
+			u8 not_data;
+		} rc5;
+	};
 };
 #define RC_MSG_SIZE_V1_20 6
 
@@ -697,8 +707,8 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(struct urb *purb)
 
 	deb_data("IR ID = %02X state = %02X System = %02X %02X Cmd = %02X %02X (len %d)\n",
 		 poll_reply->report_id, poll_reply->data_state,
-		 poll_reply->system, poll_reply->not_system,
-		 poll_reply->data, poll_reply->not_data,
+		 poll_reply->nec.system, poll_reply->nec.not_system,
+		 poll_reply->nec.data, poll_reply->nec.not_data,
 		 purb->actual_length);
 
 	switch (d->props.rc.core.protocol) {
@@ -707,30 +717,30 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(struct urb *purb)
 		toggle = 0;
 
 		/* NEC protocol sends repeat code as 0 0 0 FF */
-		if (poll_reply->system     == 0x00 &&
-		    poll_reply->not_system == 0x00 &&
-		    poll_reply->data       == 0x00 &&
-		    poll_reply->not_data   == 0xff) {
+		if (poll_reply->nec.system     == 0x00 &&
+		    poll_reply->nec.not_system == 0x00 &&
+		    poll_reply->nec.data       == 0x00 &&
+		    poll_reply->nec.not_data   == 0xff) {
 			poll_reply->data_state = 2;
 			break;
 		}
 
-		if ((poll_reply->data ^ poll_reply->not_data) != 0xff) {
+		if ((poll_reply->nec.data ^ poll_reply->nec.not_data) != 0xff) {
 			deb_data("NEC32 protocol\n");
-			keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC32(poll_reply->system     << 24 |
-						     poll_reply->not_system << 16 |
-						     poll_reply->data       << 8  |
-						     poll_reply->not_data);
-		} else if ((poll_reply->system ^ poll_reply->not_system) != 0xff) {
+			keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC32(poll_reply->nec.system     << 24 |
+						     poll_reply->nec.not_system << 16 |
+						     poll_reply->nec.data       << 8  |
+						     poll_reply->nec.not_data);
+		} else if ((poll_reply->nec.system ^ poll_reply->nec.not_system) != 0xff) {
 			deb_data("NEC extended protocol\n");
-			keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NECX(poll_reply->system << 8 |
-						    poll_reply->not_system,
-						    poll_reply->data);
+			keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NECX(poll_reply->nec.system << 8 |
+						    poll_reply->nec.not_system,
+						    poll_reply->nec.data);
 
 		} else {
 			deb_data("NEC normal protocol\n");
-			keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC(poll_reply->system,
-						   poll_reply->data);
+			keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC(poll_reply->nec.system,
+						   poll_reply->nec.data);
 		}
 
 		break;
@@ -738,19 +748,19 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(struct urb *purb)
 		deb_data("RC5 protocol\n");
 		protocol = RC_TYPE_RC5;
 		toggle = poll_reply->report_id;
-		keycode = RC_SCANCODE_RC5(poll_reply->system, poll_reply->data);
+		keycode = RC_SCANCODE_RC5(poll_reply->rc5.system, poll_reply->rc5.data);
+
+		if ((poll_reply->rc5.data ^ poll_reply->rc5.not_data) != 0xff) {
+			/* Key failed integrity check */
+			err("key failed integrity check: %02x %02x %02x %02x",
+			    poll_reply->rc5.not_used, poll_reply->rc5.system,
+			    poll_reply->rc5.data, poll_reply->rc5.not_data);
+			goto resubmit;
+		}
 
 		break;
 	}
 
-	if ((poll_reply->data + poll_reply->not_data) != 0xff) {
-		/* Key failed integrity check */
-		err("key failed integrity check: %02x %02x %02x %02x",
-		    poll_reply->system,  poll_reply->not_system,
-		    poll_reply->data, poll_reply->not_data);
-		goto resubmit;
-	}
-
 	rc_keydown(d->rc_dev, protocol, keycode, toggle);
 
 resubmit:
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ