[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzy54Bw9L4dGox=8TzBWoeyg3HUjOgitYKhtnvEq+1-dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:51:18 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 4.2-rc2: early boot memory corruption from FPU rework
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> I understand why you were misled by it, but the old "xsave_hdr_struct"
> was wrong. Fenghua even posted patches to remove it before the FPU
> rework (you were cc'd):
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/18/164
Oh, and that patch looks like a good idea.
I wish there was some way to make sure sizeof() fail on it so that
we'd enforce that nobody allocates that thing as-is. I had this dim
memory that an unsized array at the end would do that, but I was
clearly wrong. It's just the array itself you can't do sizeof on, not
the structure that contains it. Is there some magic trick that I'm
forgetting?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists