[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1437033863-15864-7-git-send-email-shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:34:23 +0530
From: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc: joel@....id.au, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/6] cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling
If frequency is throttled due to OCC reset then cpus will be in Psafe
frequency, so restore the frequency on all cpus to policy->cur when
OCCs are active again. And if frequency is throttled due to Pmax
capping then restore the frequency of all the cpus in the chip on
unthrottling.
Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
No changes from v4
Changes from v3:
- Refer to the members of 'struct opal_occ_msg' in the patch.
Replace 'reason' with 'omsg.throttle_status'
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
index 90b4293..546e056 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ static struct chip {
bool throttled;
cpumask_t mask;
struct work_struct throttle;
+ bool restore;
} *chips;
static int nr_chips;
@@ -415,9 +416,29 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
+ unsigned int cpu;
+ cpumask_var_t mask;
smp_call_function_any(&chip->mask,
powernv_cpufreq_throttle_check, NULL, 0);
+
+ if (!chip->restore)
+ return;
+
+ chip->restore = false;
+ cpumask_copy(mask, &chip->mask);
+ for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask) {
+ int index, tcpu;
+ struct cpufreq_policy policy;
+
+ cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
+ cpufreq_frequency_table_target(&policy, policy.freq_table,
+ policy.cur,
+ CPUFREQ_RELATION_C, &index);
+ powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
+ for_each_cpu(tcpu, policy.cpus)
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(tcpu, mask);
+ }
}
static char throttle_reason[][30] = {
@@ -469,8 +490,10 @@ static int powernv_cpufreq_occ_msg(struct notifier_block *nb,
throttled = false;
pr_info("OCC: Active\n");
- for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++) {
+ chips[i].restore = true;
schedule_work(&chips[i].throttle);
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -487,8 +510,11 @@ static int powernv_cpufreq_occ_msg(struct notifier_block *nb,
return 0;
for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++)
- if (chips[i].id == omsg.chip)
+ if (chips[i].id == omsg.chip) {
+ if (!omsg.throttle_status)
+ chips[i].restore = true;
schedule_work(&chips[i].throttle);
+ }
}
return 0;
}
@@ -542,6 +568,7 @@ static int init_chip_info(void)
chips[i].throttled = false;
cpumask_copy(&chips[i].mask, cpumask_of_node(chip[i]));
INIT_WORK(&chips[i].throttle, powernv_cpufreq_work_fn);
+ chips[i].restore = false;
}
return 0;
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists