linux-kernel - Re: [v3,1/2] cxl: Add explicit precision specifiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150716095909.3C4701402B5@ozlabs.org>
Date:	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:59:09 +1000 (AEST)
From:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3,1/2] cxl: Add explicit precision specifiers

On Thu, 2015-11-06 at 11:27:51 UTC, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> C99 says that a precision given as simply '.' with no following digits
> or * should be interpreted as 0. The kernel's printf implementation,
> however, treats this case as if the precision was omitted. C99 also
> says that if both the precision and value are 0, no digits should be
> printed. Even if the kernel followed C99 to the letter, I don't think
> that would be particularly useful in these cases. For consistency with
> most other format strings in the file, use an explicit precision of 16
> and add a 0x prefix.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>

Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/80c394fab89649585089

cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/