linux-kernel - Re: Checkpatch: False positive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:35:58 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Checkpatch: False positive

On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 16:25 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Andy/Joe,
> 
> I got a warning today for my cover-letter, and it looked like a false
> positive. Please have a look, based of v4.2-rc2.
> -----------------------
> 0000-cover-letter.patch
> -----------------------
> WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
> #31: 
>  arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c         | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------

There are a lot of other false positives for this test.

Maybe it's not worth checking for this condition and the
test should be removed as "fixing" it may not be feasible.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/