| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:29:17 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
bobby.prani@...il.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/19] rcu: Apply rcu_seq operations to _rcu_barrier()
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
The rcu_seq operations were open-coded in _rcu_barrier(), so this commit
replaces the open-coding with the shiny new rcu_seq operations.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/trace/events/rcu.h | 1 -
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 72 ++++++++++++----------------------------------
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 2 +-
kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c | 4 +--
4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/rcu.h b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
index c78e88ce5ea3..ef72c4aada56 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rcu.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
@@ -661,7 +661,6 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_torture_read,
* Tracepoint for _rcu_barrier() execution. The string "s" describes
* the _rcu_barrier phase:
* "Begin": _rcu_barrier() started.
- * "Check": _rcu_barrier() checking for piggybacking.
* "EarlyExit": _rcu_barrier() piggybacked, thus early exit.
* "Inc1": _rcu_barrier() piggyback check counter incremented.
* "OfflineNoCB": _rcu_barrier() found callback on never-online CPU
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 338ea61929bd..44245ae4c1c2 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3568,10 +3568,10 @@ static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
struct rcu_state *rsp = rdp->rsp;
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count)) {
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "LastCB", -1, rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "LastCB", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
complete(&rsp->barrier_completion);
} else {
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "CB", -1, rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "CB", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
}
}
@@ -3583,7 +3583,7 @@ static void rcu_barrier_func(void *type)
struct rcu_state *rsp = type;
struct rcu_data *rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "IRQ", -1, rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "IRQ", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
atomic_inc(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count);
rsp->call(&rdp->barrier_head, rcu_barrier_callback);
}
@@ -3596,55 +3596,24 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
int cpu;
struct rcu_data *rdp;
- unsigned long snap = READ_ONCE(rsp->n_barrier_done);
- unsigned long snap_done;
+ unsigned long s = rcu_seq_snap(&rsp->barrier_sequence);
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Begin", -1, snap);
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Begin", -1, s);
/* Take mutex to serialize concurrent rcu_barrier() requests. */
mutex_lock(&rsp->barrier_mutex);
- /*
- * Ensure that all prior references, including to ->n_barrier_done,
- * are ordered before the _rcu_barrier() machinery.
- */
- smp_mb(); /* See above block comment. */
-
- /*
- * Recheck ->n_barrier_done to see if others did our work for us.
- * This means checking ->n_barrier_done for an even-to-odd-to-even
- * transition. The "if" expression below therefore rounds the old
- * value up to the next even number and adds two before comparing.
- */
- snap_done = rsp->n_barrier_done;
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Check", -1, snap_done);
-
- /*
- * If the value in snap is odd, we needed to wait for the current
- * rcu_barrier() to complete, then wait for the next one, in other
- * words, we need the value of snap_done to be three larger than
- * the value of snap. On the other hand, if the value in snap is
- * even, we only had to wait for the next rcu_barrier() to complete,
- * in other words, we need the value of snap_done to be only two
- * greater than the value of snap. The "(snap + 3) & ~0x1" computes
- * this for us (thank you, Linus!).
- */
- if (ULONG_CMP_GE(snap_done, (snap + 3) & ~0x1)) {
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "EarlyExit", -1, snap_done);
+ /* Did someone else do our work for us? */
+ if (rcu_seq_done(&rsp->barrier_sequence, s)) {
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "EarlyExit", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
smp_mb(); /* caller's subsequent code after above check. */
mutex_unlock(&rsp->barrier_mutex);
return;
}
- /*
- * Increment ->n_barrier_done to avoid duplicate work. Use
- * WRITE_ONCE() to prevent the compiler from speculating
- * the increment to precede the early-exit check.
- */
- WRITE_ONCE(rsp->n_barrier_done, rsp->n_barrier_done + 1);
- WARN_ON_ONCE((rsp->n_barrier_done & 0x1) != 1);
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Inc1", -1, rsp->n_barrier_done);
- smp_mb(); /* Order ->n_barrier_done increment with below mechanism. */
+ /* Mark the start of the barrier operation. */
+ rcu_seq_start(&rsp->barrier_sequence);
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Inc1", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
/*
* Initialize the count to one rather than to zero in order to
@@ -3668,10 +3637,10 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
if (rcu_is_nocb_cpu(cpu)) {
if (!rcu_nocb_cpu_needs_barrier(rsp, cpu)) {
_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OfflineNoCB", cpu,
- rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ rsp->barrier_sequence);
} else {
_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OnlineNoCB", cpu,
- rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ rsp->barrier_sequence);
smp_mb__before_atomic();
atomic_inc(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count);
__call_rcu(&rdp->barrier_head,
@@ -3679,11 +3648,11 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
}
} else if (READ_ONCE(rdp->qlen)) {
_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OnlineQ", cpu,
- rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ rsp->barrier_sequence);
smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_barrier_func, rsp, 1);
} else {
_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OnlineNQ", cpu,
- rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ rsp->barrier_sequence);
}
}
put_online_cpus();
@@ -3695,16 +3664,13 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count))
complete(&rsp->barrier_completion);
- /* Increment ->n_barrier_done to prevent duplicate work. */
- smp_mb(); /* Keep increment after above mechanism. */
- WRITE_ONCE(rsp->n_barrier_done, rsp->n_barrier_done + 1);
- WARN_ON_ONCE((rsp->n_barrier_done & 0x1) != 0);
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Inc2", -1, rsp->n_barrier_done);
- smp_mb(); /* Keep increment before caller's subsequent code. */
-
/* Wait for all rcu_barrier_callback() callbacks to be invoked. */
wait_for_completion(&rsp->barrier_completion);
+ /* Mark the end of the barrier operation. */
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Inc2", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
+ rcu_seq_end(&rsp->barrier_sequence);
+
/* Other rcu_barrier() invocations can now safely proceed. */
mutex_unlock(&rsp->barrier_mutex);
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 4edc277d08eb..5c1042d9c310 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ struct rcu_state {
struct mutex barrier_mutex; /* Guards barrier fields. */
atomic_t barrier_cpu_count; /* # CPUs waiting on. */
struct completion barrier_completion; /* Wake at barrier end. */
- unsigned long n_barrier_done; /* ++ at start and end of */
+ unsigned long barrier_sequence; /* ++ at start and end of */
/* _rcu_barrier(). */
/* End of fields guarded by barrier_mutex. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c b/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c
index 36c04b46d3b8..d9982a2ce305 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c
@@ -81,9 +81,9 @@ static void r_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
static int show_rcubarrier(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
struct rcu_state *rsp = (struct rcu_state *)m->private;
- seq_printf(m, "bcc: %d nbd: %lu\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "bcc: %d bseq: %lu\n",
atomic_read(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count),
- rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ rsp->barrier_sequence);
return 0;
}
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists