lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150717103450.GJ11162@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:34:50 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Nariman Poushin <nariman@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the regmap tree

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:44:36AM +0100, Nariman Poushin wrote:

> What is the best course of action here? I am more than happy to help with
> whatever is needed but unsure of the etiquette here and also not sure
> what I can do.

> Clearly there are some clients that need updating but they were not
> present in the regmap tree, so is the correct thing to do to merge
> in the mfd and sound-asoc tree and provide a fixup commit?

> Just let me know and I am happy to do whatever is deemed correct.

Please send patches fixing the problems you have introduced.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ