[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150717110016.GB19067@red-moon>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:00:16 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm64, pci: Allow RC drivers to supply
pcibios_add_device() implementation.
Hi David,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 06:00:36PM +0100, David Daney wrote:
> On 07/16/2015 02:04 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:54:43PM +0100, David Daney wrote:
> >> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
> >>
> [...]
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> >> index 4095379..3356023 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> >> @@ -38,11 +38,21 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
> >> return res->start;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static int (*pcibios_add_device_impl)(struct pci_dev *);
> >> +
> >> +void set_pcibios_add_device(int (*arg)(struct pci_dev *))
> >> +{
> >> + pcibios_add_device_impl = arg;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device
> >> */
> >> int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >> {
> >> + if (pcibios_add_device_impl)
> >> + return pcibios_add_device_impl(dev);
> >
> > I am totally against this (and to be honest by reading the other
> > patches I failed to understand why you even need it), see above.
> >
>
> It is because ...
>
>
> > Thanks,
> > Lorenzo
> >
> >> +
> >> dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
>
>
> ... this is total crap. But I didn't want to break existing systems.
That's a good aim, but you are still failing to explain the issue properly
I am afraid.
> The PCI RC drivers need a way to configure the legacy virtual-wire
> interrupts, because the existing code doesn't do it.
Can I ask you please to explain the issue a bit more clearly (and why
the OF API does not work for you ?)
Thank you !
Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists