[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150717185953.GA17821@Morat.xayto.local>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:59:53 +0000
From: Craig Inches <craig.inches@...to.net>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Craig Inches <craig.inches@...to.net>, lidza.louina@...il.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Drivers: Staging: dgnc: Fix Style Issues
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:13:43PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 03:03:24AM +0000, Craig Inches wrote:
> > Fixed multiple instances of:
> >
> > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> > CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary before a close brace '}'
> > CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines
> > CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{'
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> >
>
> Split the patch into 5 patches.
Sorry.. I dont know why I didnt do that.
> > @@ -186,18 +191,23 @@ int dgnc_tty_register(struct dgnc_board *brd)
> > brd->SerialDriver.subtype = SERIAL_TYPE_NORMAL;
> > brd->SerialDriver.init_termios = DgncDefaultTermios;
> > brd->SerialDriver.driver_name = DRVSTR;
> > - brd->SerialDriver.flags = (TTY_DRIVER_REAL_RAW | TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV | TTY_DRIVER_HARDWARE_BREAK);
> > + brd->SerialDriver.flags = (TTY_DRIVER_REAL_RAW | TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV
> > + | TTY_DRIVER_HARDWARE_BREAK);
>
> The operator goes on the end.
>
> brd->SerialDriver.flags = (TTY_DRIVER_REAL_RAW |
> TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV |
> TTY_DRIVER_HARDWARE_BREAK);
Thanks I saw a combination of either, I will take another look.
> > kref_init(&brd->PrintDriver.kref);
> > - brd->PrintDriver.termios = kcalloc(brd->maxports, sizeof(*brd->PrintDriver.termios), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + brd->PrintDriver.termios = kcalloc(brd->maxports,
> > + sizeof(*brd->PrintDriver.termios),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Not aligned correctly.
>
> > if (ch->ch_tun.un_flags & UN_ISOPEN) {
> > if ((ch->ch_tun.un_tty->flags & (1 << TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP)) &&
> > - ch->ch_tun.un_tty->ldisc->ops->write_wakeup) {
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ch->ch_lock, flags);
> > - (ch->ch_tun.un_tty->ldisc->ops->write_wakeup)(ch->ch_tun.un_tty);
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&ch->ch_lock, flags);
> > + ch->ch_tun.un_tty->ldisc->ops->write_wakeup) {
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ch->ch_lock, flags);
> > + (ch->ch_tun.un_tty->ldisc->ops->write_wakeup)
> > + (ch->ch_tun.un_tty);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&ch->ch_lock, flags);
> > }
>
> This isn't correct at all.
OK, Ill another look at this aswell. Thank you for the feedback
Dan.
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists