[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150717115505.GF19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:55:05 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: kaixu xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>, ast@...mgrid.com,
davem@...emloft.net, acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pi3orama@....com, hekuang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] bpf: Implement function bpf_read_pmu() that get
the selected hardware PMU conuter
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 07:45:02PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> >Depends on what all you need, if you need full perf events to work then
> >yes perf_event_read_value() is your only option.
> >
> >But note that that requires scheduling, so you cannot actually use it
> >for tracing purposes etc..
> What you mean "full perf events"? Even with your code some event still not
> work?
The code I posted only works for events that do not have inherit set.
And only works from IRQ/NMI context for events that monitor the current
task or the current CPU (although that needs a little extra code still).
Anything else and it does not work (correctly).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists