[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150717015623.GA94233@jaegeuk-mac02.mot.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:57:43 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: allow zeroed name length during
find_dentry
Hi Chao,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 06:03:46PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@...nel.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 6:38 AM
> > To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> > Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: allow zeroed name length during find_dentry
> >
> > Since find_dentry doesn't lock its dentry page, it can traverse intermediate
> > bit positions consisting of a big dentry.
> > For these bit positions, this patch fills the intermediate name length fields
> > as zeros and skips them during look-up.
>
> I didn't get it, AFAIK, dentry page will be accessed under protection of
> i_mutex, if our inode operation has no bug, why this zeroed name_len can
> exist?
Indeed. I've checked that again, and i_mutex covers this.
I'll drop this patch, and let me keep an eye on any further bug report about
this. :)
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/dir.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/dir.c b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
> > index a34ebd8..71195f5 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/dir.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
> > @@ -141,11 +141,15 @@ struct f2fs_dir_entry *find_target_dentry(struct f2fs_filename *fname,
> > *max_slots = max_len;
> > max_len = 0;
> >
> > - /* remain bug on condition */
> > - if (unlikely(!de->name_len))
> > - d->max = -1;
> > -
> > - bit_pos += GET_DENTRY_SLOTS(le16_to_cpu(de->name_len));
> > + /*
> > + * While a large dentry is adding, it can traverse its valid bit
> > + * positions, since find_entry does not lock its dentry page.
> > + * In that case, let's skip the bit position.
> > + */
> > + if (de_name.len == 0)
> > + bit_pos++;
> > + else
> > + bit_pos += GET_DENTRY_SLOTS(de_name.len);
> > }
> >
> > de = NULL;
> > @@ -505,8 +509,12 @@ void f2fs_update_dentry(nid_t ino, umode_t mode, struct f2fs_dentry_ptr
> > *d,
> > memcpy(d->filename[bit_pos], name->name, name->len);
> > de->ino = cpu_to_le32(ino);
> > set_de_type(de, mode);
> > - for (i = 0; i < slots; i++)
> > + for (i = 0; i < slots; i++) {
> > + /* fill zeros for intermediate name_len slots */
> > + if (i >= 1)
> > + d->dentry[bit_pos + i].name_len = 0;
> > test_and_set_bit_le(bit_pos + i, (void *)d->bitmap);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > --
> > 2.1.1
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
> > GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
> > you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
> > Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
> > https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists