[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150717124054.GE26091@leverpostej>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:40:54 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"david.griego@...aro.org" <david.griego@...aro.org>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] arm64: refactor save_stack_trace()
Hi,
> @@ -354,7 +330,7 @@ static int t_show(struct seq_file *m, vo
> seq_printf(m, " Depth Size Location"
> " (%d entries)\n"
> " ----- ---- --------\n",
> - max_stack_trace.nr_entries - 1);
> + max_stack_trace.nr_entries);
I believe you'll want the same fix in print_max_stack, given it's a
carbon copy.
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists