[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150717131252.GL19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:12:52 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Alex Ng <alexng@...rosoft.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, meminit: replace rwsem with completion
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:22:02PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
>
> Commit 0e1cc95b4cc7 ("mm: meminit: finish initialisation of struct pages
> before basic setup") introduced a rwsem to signal completion of the
> initialization workers.
>
> Lockdep complains about possible recursive locking:
> =============================================
> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> 4.1.0-12802-g1dc51b8 #3 Not tainted
> ---------------------------------------------
> swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
> (pgdat_init_rwsem){++++.+},
> at: [<ffffffff8424c7fb>] page_alloc_init_late+0xc7/0xe6
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (pgdat_init_rwsem){++++.+},
> at: [<ffffffff8424c772>] page_alloc_init_late+0x3e/0xe6
>
> Replace the rwsem by a completion together with an atomic
> "outstanding work counter".
>
> [peterz@...radead.org: Barrier removal on the grounds of being pointless]
> [mgorman@...e.de: Applied review feedback]
> Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists