[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2035533471.2349.1437140685694.JavaMail.open-xchange@ox1app>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:44:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: tom <tom@...bertland.com>, herbert <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
tgraf <tgraf@...g.ch>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dvlasenk <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"alexander.h.duyck" <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>,
kadlec <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] jhash: Deinline jhash, jhash2 and __jhash_nwords
> On July 16, 2015 at 9:23 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> It might be useful to have these performance impacting
> changes guarded by something like CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
> with another static __always_inline __<func> and a function &
> EXPORT_SYMBOL or just a static inline so that where code size
> is critical it's uninlined.
But keep in mind that jhash, jhash2 and __jhash_nwords are *not*
one-instruction long functions. We duplicate code over and over resulting
probably in more cache misses. __always_inline__ is probably too strict
and a vanilla inline is already for 99% of all distribution builds a
__always_inline__, see ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING and
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE.
The answer depends on the specific workload. Sometimes an enforced inline
perform better and sometimes a call is the better solution (read: less
cache misses). General purpose vendors with a larger working set size
should reduce cache misses by deinline many functions. For
high-performance special fast-path operations a strong inlined kernel
build is probably faster. __always_inline__ makes it impossible for the
user to deinline functions or not.
Hagen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists