linux-kernel - Re: Need a pairing decrement if pm_runtime_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1507170956330.10596-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:12:04 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Junjie Mao <junjie.mao@...ght.me>
cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Need a pairing decrement if pm_runtime_get_sync() fails?

On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Junjie Mao wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> While analyzing the source, I notice that many drivers use
> pm_runtime_get_sync() in the following pattern:
> 
>     err = pm_runtime_get_sync(...)
>     if (err < 0) {
>         dev_err(...);
>         return err;
>     }
> 
> Can this lead to the imbalance of runtime PM usage counter, as the
> counter is always incremented in __pm_runtime_resume() regardless of the
> return value?

Yes, it can.

>  Is a pairing decrement (e.g. pm_runtime_put_sync() or
> pm_runtime_put_noidle()) a must on the error-handling path? If so, which
> is a better fix, adding a pairing decrement to each call site, or
> decrementing the usage counter in __pm_runtime_resume() if rpm_resume()
> fails?

The thing is, most errors in runtime resume are not recoverable.  If 
the system isn't able to resume a device now, chances are it won't be 
able to resume the device later.  (The major exception is out-of-memory 
errors.)  That's probably why lots of drivers just give up.

On the other hand, there are places where the code is careful to 
decrement the usage counter when a get_sync fails.  For example, see 
drivers/usb/core/driver.c:usb_autoresume_device().

Another thing to consider is what happens when pm_runtime_get fails.  
The failure occurs after the subroutine call, in a workqueue routine.  
That routine doesn't know whether it should decrement the usage counter 
after a failure.  Perhaps the PM core should be fixed so that it _does_ 
know this.

Then the usage counter could always be adjusted by a core routine after 
a resume failure.  But of course, this means we would have to audit the 
kernel for places where the caller does its own adjustment.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/