linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 4/4] audit: avoid double copying the audit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 23:24:01 -0400
From:	Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
To:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc:	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sgrubb@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 4/4] audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string

On Thursday, July 16, 2015 10:01:30 PM Eric Paris wrote:
> I have to admit, I'm partial to not merging this (with the other
> patches).  Changing object lifetimes in what i seem to remember is long
> standing code (auditfilter, not auditexe) seems to me like something we
> really would want to be git bisectable, not mushed with an unrelated
> feature addition. But it ain't my tree   :)

It's been a long day, and maybe I'm missing something here, but this patch 
only affects the new code, no?

> On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 22:01 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 15/07/16, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 11:50:26 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > > Make this interface consistent with watch and filter key,
> > > > avoiding the extra
> > > > string copy and simply consume the new string pointer.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > >  kernel/audit_exe.c      |    8 ++++++--
> > > >  kernel/audit_fsnotify.c |    9 +--------
> > > >  kernel/auditfilter.c    |    2 +-
> > > >  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Merge this patch too, there is no reason why these needs to be its
> > > own patch.
> > 
> > I wanted to keep this patch seperate until it is well understood and
> > accepted rather than mix it in.
> > 
> > I'm fine merging it if you prefer.
> > 
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/audit_exe.c b/kernel/audit_exe.c
> > > > index 75ad4f2..09e4eb4 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/audit_exe.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/audit_exe.c
> > > > @@ -27,11 +27,15 @@ int audit_dupe_exe(struct audit_krule *new,
> > > > struct
> > > > audit_krule *old) struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark;
> > > > 
> > > >  	char *pathname;
> > > > 
> > > > -	pathname = audit_mark_path(old->exe);
> > > > +	pathname = kstrdup(audit_mark_path(old->exe),
> > > > GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +	if (!pathname)
> > > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > 
> > > >  	audit_mark = audit_alloc_mark(new, pathname,
> > > > 
> > > > strlen(pathname));
> > > > -	if (IS_ERR(audit_mark))
> > > > +	if (IS_ERR(audit_mark)) {
> > > > +		kfree(pathname);
> > > > 
> > > >  		return PTR_ERR(audit_mark);
> > > > 
> > > > +	}
> > > > 
> > > >  	new->exe = audit_mark;
> > > >  	
> > > >  	return 0;
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c b/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> > > > index a4e7b16..e57e08a 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
> > > > @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark
> > > > *audit_alloc_mark(struct
> > > > audit_krule *krule, char *pa struct dentry *dentry;
> > > > 
> > > >  	struct inode *inode;
> > > >  	unsigned long ino;
> > > > 
> > > > -	char *local_pathname;
> > > > 
> > > >  	dev_t dev;
> > > >  	int ret;
> > > > 
> > > > @@ -115,21 +114,15 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark
> > > > *audit_alloc_mark(struct
> > > > audit_krule *krule, char *pa ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino;
> > > > 
> > > >  	}
> > > > 
> > > > -	audit_mark = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > > -	local_pathname = kstrdup(pathname, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > -	if (!local_pathname)
> > > > -		goto out;
> > > > -
> > > > 
> > > >  	audit_mark = kzalloc(sizeof(*audit_mark), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > >  	if (unlikely(!audit_mark)) {
> > > > 
> > > > -		kfree(local_pathname);
> > > > 
> > > >  		audit_mark = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > >  		goto out;
> > > >  	
> > > >  	}
> > > >  	
> > > >  	fsnotify_init_mark(&audit_mark->mark,
> > > > 
> > > > audit_fsnotify_free_mark);
> > > > 
> > > >  	audit_mark->mark.mask = AUDIT_FS_EVENTS;
> > > > 
> > > > -	audit_mark->path = local_pathname;
> > > > +	audit_mark->path = pathname;
> > > > 
> > > >  	audit_mark->ino = ino;
> > > >  	audit_mark->dev = dev;
> > > >  	audit_mark->rule = krule;
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> > > > index f65c97f..f46ed69 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> > > > @@ -559,8 +559,8 @@ static struct audit_entry
> > > > *audit_data_to_entry(struct
> > > > audit_rule_data *data, entry->rule.buflen += f->val;
> > > > 
> > > >  			audit_mark = audit_alloc_mark(&entry
> > > > 
> > > > ->rule, str, f->val);
> > > > -			kfree(str);
> > > > 
> > > >  			if (IS_ERR(audit_mark)) {
> > > > 
> > > > +				kfree(str);
> > > > 
> > > >  				err = PTR_ERR(audit_mark);
> > > >  				goto exit_free;
> > > >  			
> > > >  			}

-- 
paul moore
security @ redhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/