lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVSJAWH7RutVeXd_Y1bdOdw_-5gv6iDspyf0p8k2D8EyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:01:55 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc:	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] x86/vm86: Move vm86 fields out of thread_struct

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
> Allocate a separate structure for the vm86 fields.
>

> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -315,12 +315,12 @@ check_v8086_mode(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
>  {
>         unsigned long bit;
>
> -       if (!v8086_mode(regs))
> +       if (!v8086_mode(regs) || !tsk->thread.vm86)
>                 return;
>

What's this for?  Shouldn't that "if (!v8086_mode(regs) ||
WARN_ON(!tsk->thread.vm86))"?

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ